Why a partial win is not a proportional win
"Only one penalty per information return filed incorrectly can be assessed" (IRM 4.19.25.7.2). The examiner evaluates failures in order of value: late filing, then missing or incorrect TIN, then paper filing when e-filing was required, and charges the highest that applies. When you win reasonable cause on one failure, the return does not leave the penalty; the examiner "must consider" the next failure on the same return (IRM 20.1.7.3.3).
The IRM's worked example (IRM 4.19.25.7.2): a small business e-files 500 Forms 1099-DIV late in late April, 50 with bad TINs. Proposed: 50 at the top-tier rate plus 450 at the 30-day rate. The TIN failures are waived, lateness is not. Recalculated: all 500 at the 30-day rate, not 450. The defaults above reproduce that example at 2026 rates.
Address every failure code on the notice. A response that argues only the expensive failure leaves the cheap one standing under every return.
Rates used
| Returns due in | Within 30 days | By August 1 | After August 1 (also TIN and paper failures) | Top-tier maximum, large / small |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | $60 | $130 | $340 | $4,191,500 / $1,397,000 |
| 2026 | $60 | $130 | $340 | $4,098,500 / $1,366,000 |
| 2025 | $60 | $130 | $330 | $3,987,000 / $1,329,000 |