TIN ComplianceA resource from TIN Comply
Calculator

LOB code finder

Pick the payee's treaty country and see every limitation-on-benefits test in that treaty, the Form 1042-S box 13n code each one maps to, and the matching box on line 14b of Form W-8BEN-E.

Basis the treaty texts and protocols linked from the IRS treaties A to Z page, read October 7, 2026; Instructions for Form 1042-S (2026), Appendix B; Instructions for Form W-8BEN-EPrivacy runs in your browser; nothing you enter is sent or stored

Australia

Article 16 (Limitation on Benefits). Protocol signed September 27, 2001 (replaced Article 16 of 1982 Convention).

020304050607091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision, local authority, agency or instrumentality (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class of shares is listed on a U.S. or Australian exchange and regularly traded (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer listed companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Listed unit trust or other non-company person, or one 50% owned by such persons (2(d))11Other (name the test)
Religious, charitable, educational, scientific entity (2(e))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension entity, more than 50% beneficiaries resident in either State (2(f))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership (50% by qualified persons) and base erosion test (2(g))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Recognized headquarters company (2(h))11Other (name the test)
Active trade or business (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (5)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: yesActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 4 denies benefits to disproportionate part of income from tracking-type share classes. Para 7 preserves domestic anti-avoidance rules. Listed unit trust test has no matching 1042-S code; use 11.

Treaty text · Australia treaty rates

Austria

Article 16 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed May 31, 1996.

020304050607091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (1(b))02Government
Active trade or business, substantial where income connected (1(c))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Ownership more than 50% by qualified persons or U.S. citizens and base erosion (1(d))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (1(e))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 90% owned by not more than five 1(e) companies (1(f))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension funds and private foundations (1(g))04Other tax-exempt organization
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension funds (1(g))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Recognized headquarters company (1(h))11Other (name the test)
Competent authority determination (2)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: yesActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 4 triangular rule: Austrian enterprise's U.S. interest/royalties via third-jurisdiction PE taxed less than 60% of Austrian rate lose Art 11(1)/12 benefits, with exceptions. HQ company defined in Protocol (not reviewed).

Treaty text · Austria treaty rates

Bangladesh

Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed September 26, 2004.

02040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (1(b))02Government
Ownership more than 50% by qualified persons or U.S. citizens and base erosion (deductible payments) (1(c))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (1(d))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 1(d) companies (1(e))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Not-for-profit organization described in Art 4(1)(c) (1(f))04Other tax-exempt organization
Active trade or business (2)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (3)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

No separate pension test in the LOB text; not-for-profit organizations under Art 4(1)(c) are covered by 1(f). Treaty PDF filename dated 1-27-2004.

Treaty text · Bangladesh treaty rates

Barbados

Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits). Second Protocol signed July 14, 2004 (replaced Article 22 of 1984 Convention).

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (1(b))02Government
Company listed, primarily traded in residence State (or Jamaica/Trinidad exchanges for Barbados), regularly traded (1(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by 1(c)(i) companies plus base erosion (1(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Ownership more than 50% by residents of same State and base erosion (1(d))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Religious, charitable, scientific, literary or educational entity (1(e))04Other tax-exempt organization
Employee benefit plan or fund, more than half beneficiaries qualified (1(f))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Active trade or business (2)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (3)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 6: persons entitled to a special tax regime get no Art 10, 11 or 12 benefits even if they meet an LOB test. Para 2(d) adds detailed bank, insurance company and active business definitions.

Treaty text · Barbados treaty rates

Belgium

Article 21 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed November 27, 2006.

02030405060708091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class of shares is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Pension fund under Art 4(3), more than 50% beneficiaries resident or sponsor qualified (2(d))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Exempt religious, charitable, scientific, artistic, cultural or educational organization under Art 4(3) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership (50% by qualified residents) and base erosion (2(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Derivative benefits, 95% owned by seven or fewer equivalent beneficiaries (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Headquarters company (5)11Other (name the test)
Competent authority determination (7)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: yesActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 6 triangular rule for Belgian enterprise's U.S. interest/royalties exempt in Belgium via third-state PE taxed less than 60%; 15% cap. Equivalent beneficiary limited to EU/EEA/NAFTA residents.

Treaty text · Belgium treaty rates

Bulgaria

Article 21 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed February 23, 2007, as amended by 2008 Protocol (posted text leaves signing day blank; Treasury file dated February 26, 2008).

020304050607080910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company with principal class regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Pension fund under Art 4(2), more than 50% beneficiaries resident (2(d))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Exempt charitable or similar organization under Art 4(2) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership and base erosion (2(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Derivative benefits, 95% owned by seven or fewer equivalent beneficiaries (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (6, renumbered)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

2008 Protocol added new para 5: triangular rule for Bulgarian enterprise's U.S. interest/royalties exempt via third-state PE taxed less than 60%; 15% cap. CA paragraph renumbered from 5 to 6.

Treaty text Also · Bulgaria treaty rates

Canada

Article XXIX A (Limitation on Benefits). Fifth Protocol signed September 21, 2007 (replaced Article XXIX A first added by 1995 Protocol).

02030405060708091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision, local authority, agency or instrumentality (2(b))02Government
Company or trust whose principal class is primarily and regularly traded on recognized exchange (2(c))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company more than 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c) companies or trusts (2(d))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Company or trust 50% owned by qualifying persons with base erosion (2(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Estate (2(f))11Other (name the test)
Not-for-profit organization (2(g))04Other tax-exempt organization
Art XXI(2) pension or retirement arrangement (2(h))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Art XXI(3) arrangement for 2(g)/2(h) beneficiaries (2(i))11Other (name the test)
Active trade or business (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Derivative benefits for Arts X, XI, XII: 90% owned by qualifying or equivalent persons plus base erosion (4)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Competent authority determination (6)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Derivative test in para 4 is not limited to EU/EEA/NAFTA; it covers residents of any country with a comprehensive U.S. treaty. Para 7 preserves general anti-abuse denial. Debt substitute and disproportionate share rules.

Treaty text · Canada treaty rates

Chile

Article 24 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed February 4, 2010.

020304050607091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
State, political subdivision, local authority, agency or instrumentality (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Headquarters company for multinational group (2(d))11Other (name the test)
Religious, charitable, educational, scientific entity (2(e))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension fund (2(f))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (2(g))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: yesActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

No derivative benefits test. Para 5 triangular rule: income via third-jurisdiction PE taxed less than 60% of residence tax loses benefits; dividends, interest, royalties capped at 15%. HQ test is a qualified-person category.

Treaty text · Chile treaty rates

China

Protocol paragraph 7 (treaty shopping), as interpreted by Protocol of May 10, 1986 paragraphs 1 to 4; no article titled Limitation on Benefits. Protocol signed April 30, 1984 and Protocol signed May 10, 1986.

050711
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Ownership more than 50% by resident individuals, U.S. citizens, listed companies or States, with base erosion for Arts 9-11 (1986 Prot. 1(a))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (1986 Prot. 1(b))05Publicly-traded corporation
No principal purpose of obtaining benefits (1986 Prot. 2)11Other (name the test)
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: noCompetent authority grant: no

Judgment call: treaty has no article named LOB, but 1984 Protocol para 7 and the 1986 interpretive Protocol impose LOB-type tests. Competent authorities must consult before denial; no discretionary grant provision. Treasury TE calls para 7 treaty shopping protection.

Judgment call. The China treaty has no article titled Limitation on Benefits; its LOB-type tests sit in paragraph 7 of the 1984 Protocol. The codes above map those tests. If you read the treaty as having no LOB article, code 12 would apply instead.

Treaty text Also · China treaty rates

Commonwealth of Independent States (1973 U.S.S.R. treaty)

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed June 20, 1973.

12
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
No LOB article in treaty12No LOB article in treaty

No LOB article and no LOB-type provision found in the treaty text. IRS pages for each of the nine countries link the same ussr.pdf.

This treaty has no limitation-on-benefits article. An entity claiming its benefits checks “No LOB article in treaty” on line 14b, and you enter code 12 in box 13n.

Treaty text · Commonwealth of Independent States treaty rates

Cyprus

Article 26 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed March 19, 1984.

050711
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
more than 75% owned by individual residents of first State and gross income not used substantially for third-country liabilities (1)07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Substantial trading on recognized exchange creates presumption of resident ownership for 1(a) (1, last sentence)05Publicly-traded corporation
No principal purpose of obtaining benefits (2)11Other (name the test)
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: noCompetent authority grant: no

No government, pension, active business or competent authority grant test. Para 2 relief applies 'if it is determined' (determiner not stated). Para 3 denies benefits to trustee income from benefit-seeking schemes.

Treaty text · Cyprus treaty rates

Czech Republic

Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed September 16, 1993.

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (1(b))02Government
Active trade or business (1(c))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (1(d))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company wholly owned by such a listed resident company (1(d))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension fund or private foundation (1(e))04Other tax-exempt organization
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension fund (1(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion (1(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Competent authority determination (2)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Older-style LOB; active business test is a qualified-person category without a substantiality requirement.

Treaty text · Czech Republic treaty rates

Denmark

Article 22 (Limitation of Benefits). Protocol signed May 2, 2006 (replaced Article 22 of 1999 Convention).

02030405060708091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Danish company more than 50% voting held by taxable nonstock corporations, other shares listed in EU/EEA (2(c)(ii))11Other (name the test)
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(iii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Charitable organization or other legal person under Art 4(1)(b)(i) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension legal person, more than 50% beneficiaries resident (2(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Danish taxable nonstock corporation (erhvervsdrivende fond) payment tests (2(g))11Other (name the test)
Derivative benefits (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Shipping and air transport income special rule (5)11Other (name the test)
Competent authority determination (7)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Special rules for Danish taxable nonstock corporations. Para 6 triangular rule for Danish enterprise's U.S. interest/royalties exempt via third-state PE taxed less than 60%; 15% cap.

Treaty text · Denmark treaty rates

Egypt

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed August 24, 1980.

1112

Code 11 or 12? IRS Table 4 lists Article 24 (Investment or Holding Companies) as the Egypt treaty’s limitation provision. That article denies some benefits to low-taxed companies owned 25% or more by non-residents, but it has none of the qualifying tests an LOB article has. The IRS has not said which box 13n code fits. One reading is 12, because there is no limitation-on-benefits article as the W-8BEN-E uses the term; the other is 11 (Other), because the IRS table treats the article as the limitation. Pick one, record why, and use it consistently.

Treaty text · Egypt treaty rates

Estonia

Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed January 15, 1998.

020304050607091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
State, political subdivision, local authority, agency or instrumentality (2(b))02Government
Company: ownership (50%, half the days) and base erosion (2(c))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Trust or estate meeting ownership and base erosion tests (2(d))11Other (name the test)
Person whose interests are substantially and regularly traded on recognized exchange (2(e)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Person 50% owned by 2(e)(i) persons (2(e)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt religious, charitable or similar organization under Art 4(3)(b)(i) (2(f))04Other tax-exempt organization
Exempt pension organization under Art 4(3)(b)(ii) (2(f))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
U.S. RIC or similar Estonian entity agreed by CAs (2(g))11Other (name the test)
Active trade or business with substantiality safe harbor (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Uses 'qualified resident' framework. Substantiality safe harbor: 7.5% asset, gross income and payroll ratios with 10% average.

Treaty text · Estonia treaty rates

Finland

Article 16 (Limitation on Benefits). Protocol signed May 31, 2006 (replaced Article 16 of 1989 Convention).

020304050607080910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision, statutory body or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Tax-exempt organization under Art 4(1)(c)(i) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension fund, more than 50% beneficiaries resident (2(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Derivative benefits (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (6)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 5 triangular rule for Finnish enterprise's U.S. interest/royalties via third-state PE. Pension fund defined in 7(j); statutory body in 7(i).

Treaty text Also · Finland treaty rates

France

Article 30 (Limitation on Benefits of the Convention). Protocol signed January 13, 2009 (replaced Article 30 of 1994 Convention).

02030405060708091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Pension trust under Art 4(2)(b)(ii) (2(d))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Exempt organization under Art 4(2)(b)(ii) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership and base erosion (2(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Investment entity under Art 4(2)(b)(iii), more than half owned by qualified residents (2(f))11Other (name the test)
Derivative benefits (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (6)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Special qualified-person test for French investment entities (e.g., collective investment vehicles) in 2(f). Para 5 triangular rule for income via third-jurisdiction PE taxed less than 60%.

Treaty text Also · France treaty rates

Germany

Article 28 (Limitation on Benefits). Protocol signed June 1, 2006 (replaced Article 28 of 1989 Convention).

020304050607080910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(aa))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(aa) companies (2(c)(bb))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Religious, charitable, educational, scientific entity (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension entity, more than 50% beneficiaries resident or sponsor qualified (2(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Derivative benefits (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (7)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 6: German Investmentvermoegen qualifies only if at least 90% owned by qualified German residents or equivalent beneficiaries. Para 5 triangular rule for income via third-jurisdiction PE.

Treaty text Also · Germany treaty rates

Greece

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed February 20, 1950; Protocol signed April 20, 1953.

12
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
No LOB article in treaty12No LOB article in treaty

No LOB article or LOB-type provision found in the treaty text.

This treaty has no limitation-on-benefits article. An entity claiming its benefits checks “No LOB article in treaty” on line 14b, and you enter code 12 in box 13n.

Treaty text · Greece treaty rates

Hungary

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed February 12, 1979 (terminated).

Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
No LOB article in treaty12No LOB article in treaty

No treaty benefits. The U.S.-Hungary treaty was terminated; it stopped applying to taxes withheld at source on January 1, 2024. Withhold at statutory rates; no LOB code applies.

Treaty text Also · Hungary treaty rates

Iceland

Article 21 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed October 23, 2007.

020304050607080910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Pension scheme or employee benefit arrangement under Art 4(2) (2(d))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Exempt religious, charitable or similar organization under Art 4(2) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership and base erosion (2(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Derivative benefits, 95% owned by seven or fewer EU/EEA/NAFTA/EFTA residents (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (7)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Derivative test extends to EFTA residents. Para 5 triangular rule; para 6 disproportionate share class rule.

Treaty text · Iceland treaty rates

India

Article 24 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed September 12, 1989.

05070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
more than 50% owned by resident individuals, States, worldwide-taxed individuals or U.S. citizens, and income not used substantially for others (1)07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business (2)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (3)05Publicly-traded corporation
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Older-style LOB applying to persons other than individuals. No separate government, pension, exempt organization or subsidiary test in the article.

Treaty text · India treaty rates

Indonesia

Article 28 (General Rules of Taxation), paragraphs 6 to 8; no article titled Limitation on Benefits. Original Convention signed July 11, 1988.

050711
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
more than 50% owned by U.S. or Indonesian resident individuals, U.S. citizens, listed companies or States, and base erosion (6)07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (7(a))05Publicly-traded corporation
No principal purpose of obtaining benefits (7(b))11Other (name the test)
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: noCompetent authority grant: no

LOB-type rules sit inside Article 28. No competent authority discretionary relief and no active business test stated. General effective date January 1, 1990 per IRS text header.

Judgment call. The Indonesia treaty has no article titled Limitation on Benefits; its LOB-type tests sit in Article 28 (General Rules of Taxation). The codes above map those tests. If you read the treaty as having no LOB article, code 12 would apply instead.

Treaty text · Indonesia treaty rates

Ireland

Article 23 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed July 28, 1997.

02030405060708091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Qualified governmental entity (2(b))02Government
Ownership 50% and base reduction test (2(c))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Listed unit trust or other non-company person, or 50% owned by such (2(d))11Other (name the test)
Company whose principal class is substantially and regularly traded (2(e)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by listed companies (2(e)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Charitable or other exempt organization under Art 4(1)(c) (2(f))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension trust or retirement benefit organization under Art 4(1)(c) (2(f))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Active trade or business (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Shipping and air transport special rule (4)11Other (name the test)
Derivative benefits, 95% owned by seven or fewer EU/NAFTA residents (5)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Competent authority determination (6)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 7 triangular rule for Irish enterprise's U.S. income via third-state PE taxed less than 50%; 15% cap. Art 4(1)(c) covers pension trusts and charitable or exempt organizations. 1999 amending convention reviewed, no LOB change.

Treaty text Also · Ireland treaty rates

Israel

Article 25 (Limitation on Benefits). Second Protocol signed January 26, 1993 (Article XII replaced Article 25 Investment or Holding Companies).

020405070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Entity described in Art 22(2)(a)-(c) (governmental) (3(b))02Government
Active trade or business (3(c))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (3(d))05Publicly-traded corporation
Exempt not-for-profit organization (3(e))04Other tax-exempt organization
Not at least 50% owned by third-country non-citizens and no at least 50% base erosion (1, framed as denial)07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Competent authority determination (4(a))10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Ownership test framed negatively (benefits denied if 50% or more owned by non-resident non-citizens). Para 2 denies benefits on disproportionate share classes. Para 5 cross-reference to 2(d) appears to mean 3(d).

Treaty text · Israel treaty rates

Italy

Protocol Article 2 (limitation on benefits). Protocol signed August 25, 1999 with Convention of same date.

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Qualified governmental entity (2(b))02Government
Company whose majority share classes are regularly traded on recognized exchange (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt religious, charitable or similar legal person (Prot. Art 1(5)(a)(i)) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Exempt pension legal person, more than 50% beneficiaries resident (Prot. Art 1(5)(a)(ii)) (2(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business with 7.5%/10% safe harbor (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

LOB is in the Protocol, not the Convention body. IRS page also links the superseded 1984 treaty (italy.pdf).

Treaty text · Italy treaty rates

Jamaica

Article 17 (Limitations on Benefits). Protocol signed July 17, 1981 (Article III replaced Article 17 Investment or Holding Companies).

05070911
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
more than 75% owned by individual residents and income not used substantially for third-country liabilities (1)07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Substantial trading on recognized exchange creates presumption of resident ownership (1)05Publicly-traded corporation
No principal purpose of obtaining benefits (2)11Other (name the test)
Business operations in Jamaica with income incidental or connected (3(a))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Owners resident in treaty countries entitled to same benefits (3(b))11Other (name the test)
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: no

Para 2 relief applies 'if it is determined' (determiner not stated); no competent authority grant. 3(b) resembles derivative benefits but is framed as a principal purpose safe harbor.

Treaty text · Jamaica treaty rates

Japan

Article 22. Original Convention signed November 6, 2003.

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, subdivision, local authority, Bank of Japan or Federal Reserve Banks (1(b))02Government
Company listed in Japan or U.S. and regularly traded (1(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 1(c)(i) residents (1(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Religious, charitable, educational or similar person under Art 4(1)(c) (1(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension fund, more than 50% beneficiaries resident (1(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (1(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business (2)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

No derivative benefits or headquarters test in Art 22. Para 3 sets timing rules for withholding at source. 2013 Protocol reviewed; no change to Art 22 found. Art 4(1)(c) covers religious, charitable, educational and similar organizations.

Treaty text Also · Japan treaty rates

Kazakhstan

Article 21 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed October 24, 1993.

040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Active conduct of business (1(b))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with shares traded in residence State on officially recognized exchange (1(c))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company wholly owned by such a resident listed company (1(c))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt not-for-profit organization (1(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion (1(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Competent authority determination (2)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

No government test in the article. Listed company test requires trading in the residence State.

Treaty text · Kazakhstan treaty rates

Latvia

Article 23 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed January 15, 1998.

020304050607091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
State, political subdivision, local authority, agency or instrumentality (2(b))02Government
Company: ownership (50%) and base erosion (2(c))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Trust or estate meeting ownership and base erosion tests (2(d))11Other (name the test)
Person whose interests are substantially and regularly traded (2(e)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Person 50% owned by 2(e)(i) persons (2(e)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt religious, charitable or pension organization under Art 4(3)(b) (2(f))04Other tax-exempt organization
Exempt pension organization under Art 4(3)(b) (2(f))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
U.S. RIC or similar Latvian entity agreed by CAs (2(g))11Other (name the test)
Active trade or business (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Same structure as Estonia and Lithuania. Art 4(3)(b) covers exempt religious/charitable bodies and exempt pension plans.

Treaty text · Latvia treaty rates

Lithuania

Article 23 (Limitation of Benefits). Original Convention signed January 15, 1998.

020304050607091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
State, political subdivision, local authority, agency or instrumentality (2(b))02Government
Company: ownership (50%) and base erosion (2(c))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Trust or estate meeting ownership and base erosion tests (2(d))11Other (name the test)
Person whose interests are substantially and regularly traded (2(e)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Person 50% owned by 2(e)(i) persons (2(e)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt organization under Art 4(3)(b) (2(f))04Other tax-exempt organization
Exempt pension organization under Art 4(3)(b) (2(f))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
U.S. RIC or similar Lithuanian entity agreed by CAs (2(g))11Other (name the test)
Active trade or business (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Same structure as Estonia and Latvia; recognized exchange includes National Stock Exchange of Lithuania. Art 4(3)(b) covers exempt religious/charitable bodies and exempt pension plans.

Treaty text · Lithuania treaty rates

Luxembourg

Article 24 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed April 3, 1996 (TE of 2009 Protocol contains no reference to Art 24).

0204050607080910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, subdivision, local authority, agency or instrumentality (2(b))02Government
Company 50% owned by qualified residents or U.S. citizens and base erosion (2(c))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Company whose principal class is substantially and regularly traded (6% turnover) (2(d))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company controlled by 2(d) publicly traded companies with base erosion (2(e))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt not-for-profit organization (2(f))04Other tax-exempt organization
Active trade or business with 7.5%/10% safe harbor (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Derivative benefits, 95% owned by seven or fewer EU/NAFTA residents (4)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Competent authority determination (7)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 5 triangular rule (less than 50% combined tax via third-jurisdiction PE; 15% cap). Para 6 disproportionate share rule. Closely-held companies cannot rely on Luxembourg or NASDAQ listing. IRS page links only the 1962 treaty.

Treaty text Also · Luxembourg treaty rates

Malta

Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed August 8, 2008.

020304050607080910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company listed, regularly and primarily traded in residence State, plus base erosion (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 75% owned by 2(c)(i) companies, plus base erosion (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt organization under Art 4(2)(b) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension fund, more than 75% beneficiaries resident (2(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership 75% and base erosion less than 25% (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Derivative benefits, 95% owned by equivalent beneficiaries, base erosion less than 25% (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business plus base erosion (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (6)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Stricter thresholds (75%, 25%); publicly traded and ATB tests also require base erosion. Para 5 triangular rule; para 7 remittance-basis rule limits relief to amounts taxed.

Treaty text · Malta treaty rates

Mexico

Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed September 18, 1992 (2002 Protocol did not amend Art 17).

020304050607080910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (1(b))02Government
Active trade or business (1(c))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with substantial and regular trading on exchange in either State (1(d)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company wholly owned by listed resident, or NAFTA-listed owned with more than 50% Contracting State listed (1(d)(ii)-(iii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension fund (1(e))04Other tax-exempt organization
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension fund (1(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion less than 50% (1(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Arts 10, 11, 11A, 12: more than 30% resident qualified owners, more than 60% NAFTA owners, base erosion limits (1(g))08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Competent authority determination (2)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

1(g) is a NAFTA-based derivative-type test limited to dividends, interest, branch tax and royalties. Protocol para 15 defines exchanges and Mexican trade or business.

Treaty text Also · Mexico treaty rates

Morocco

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed August 1, 1977.

1112

Code 11 or 12? IRS Table 4 lists Article 24 (Investment or Holding Companies) as the Morocco treaty’s limitation provision. That article denies some benefits to low-taxed companies owned 25% or more by non-residents, but it has none of the qualifying tests an LOB article has. The IRS has not said which box 13n code fits. One reading is 12, because there is no limitation-on-benefits article as the W-8BEN-E uses the term; the other is 11 (Other), because the IRS table treats the article as the limitation. Pick one, record why, and use it consistently.

Treaty text · Morocco treaty rates

Netherlands

Article 26 (Limitation on Benefits). Protocol signed March 8, 2004 (replaced Article 26 of 1992 Convention).

02030405060708091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company listed in NL or U.S. and regularly traded, unless no substantial presence (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt pension trust under Art 35 (2(d))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Other not-for-profit organization (2(e))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership and base erosion (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Derivative benefits (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Headquarters company (5)11Other (name the test)
Shipping and air transport special rule (6)11Other (name the test)
Competent authority determination (7)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: yesActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

W-8BEN-E instructions use 'Headquarters test, Article 26(5)' as the example Other entry. Listed test has substantial presence condition; primary economic zone includes EU/EEA.

Treaty text · Netherlands treaty rates

New Zealand

Article 16 (Limitation on Benefits). Protocol signed December 1, 2008 (replaced Article 16 of 1982 Convention).

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Pension fund under Art 4(1)(a)/(b), more than 50% beneficiaries resident (2(d))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Exempt organization under Art 4(1)(a)/(b) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership and base erosion (2(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

No derivative or headquarters test. Para 5 triangular rule for income via third-jurisdiction PE.

Treaty text Also · New Zealand treaty rates

Norway

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed December 3, 1971; Protocol 1980.

1112

Code 11 or 12? IRS Table 4 lists Article 20 (Investment or Holding Companies) as the Norway treaty’s limitation provision. That article denies some benefits to low-taxed companies owned 25% or more by non-residents, but it has none of the qualifying tests an LOB article has. The IRS has not said which box 13n code fits. One reading is 12, because there is no limitation-on-benefits article as the W-8BEN-E uses the term; the other is 11 (Other), because the IRS table treats the article as the limitation. Pick one, record why, and use it consistently.

Treaty text Also · Norway treaty rates

Pakistan

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed July 1, 1957.

12
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
No LOB article in treaty12No LOB article in treaty

No LOB article. Article XVII (Limitations on Effect of Treaty) is a nondiscrimination rule, not an LOB.

This treaty has no limitation-on-benefits article. An entity claiming its benefits checks “No LOB article in treaty” on line 14b, and you enter code 12 in box 13n.

Treaty text · Pakistan treaty rates

Philippines

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed October 1, 1976.

12
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
No LOB article in treaty12No LOB article in treaty

No LOB article or LOB-type provision found in the treaty text.

This treaty has no limitation-on-benefits article. An entity claiming its benefits checks “No LOB article in treaty” on line 14b, and you enter code 12 in box 13n.

Treaty text · Philippines treaty rates

Poland

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed October 8, 1974.

12
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
No LOB article in treaty12No LOB article in treaty

No LOB article or LOB-type provision found in the 1974 treaty text.

This treaty has no limitation-on-benefits article. An entity claiming its benefits checks “No LOB article in treaty” on line 14b, and you enter code 12 in box 13n.

Treaty text · Poland treaty rates

Portugal

Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed September 6, 1994.

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
State, subdivision, local authority or wholly owned institution (1(b))02Government
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (1(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company more than 50% owned by listed resident companies or 1(b) persons (1(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Not-for-profit organization under Protocol 3(b)(i) (1(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension trust under Protocol 3(b)(ii) (1(d))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion (1(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business, substantial (2)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (3)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 6 denies all benefits to persons entitled to Madeira or Santa Maria Island free-zone benefits or similar later regimes.

Treaty text · Portugal treaty rates

Romania

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed December 4, 1973.

12
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
No LOB article in treaty12No LOB article in treaty

No LOB article or LOB-type provision found in the treaty text.

This treaty has no limitation-on-benefits article. An entity claiming its benefits checks “No LOB article in treaty” on line 14b, and you enter code 12 in box 13n.

Treaty text · Romania treaty rates

Russia (suspended; note only)

Article 20 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed June 17, 1992.

Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Active conduct of business (1(b))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Listed company or wholly owned subsidiary (1(c))05Publicly-traded corporation
Exempt not-for-profit organization (1(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion (1(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Competent authority determination (2)10Favorable discretionary determination received

Suspended. The United States suspended most of the Russia treaty, including Article 20 (Limitation on Benefits), effective August 16, 2024. No reduced treaty rates are available, so no LOB code applies.

Treaty text Also · Russia treaty rates

Slovak Republic

Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed October 8, 1993.

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (1(b))02Government
Active trade or business (1(c))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (1(d))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company wholly owned by such a listed resident company (1(d))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension fund or private foundation (1(e))04Other tax-exempt organization
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension fund (1(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion (1(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Competent authority determination (2)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Same structure as Czech Republic.

Treaty text · Slovak Republic treaty rates

Slovenia

Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed June 21, 1999.

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Qualified governmental entity (2(b))02Government
Company whose majority share classes are regularly traded (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt religious, charitable or similar legal person, Art 4(1)(c)(i) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Exempt pension legal person, Art 4(1)(c)(ii), more than 50% beneficiaries resident (2(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business, substantial (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Recognized exchanges include Ljubljana, Frankfurt, London, Paris and Vienna.

Treaty text · Slovenia treaty rates

South Africa

Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed February 17, 1997.

020304050607091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose majority share classes are regularly traded (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt charitable or similar legal person (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Exempt pension legal person, more than 50% beneficiaries resident (2(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (non-trust) (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Trust ownership (274 days) and base erosion (2(g))11Other (name the test)
Active trade or business with 7.5%/10% safe harbor (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 6 triangular rule: South African enterprise's U.S. income via third-jurisdiction PE taxed less than 50%; interest and royalties capped at 15%; exceptions for active business, self-developed IP, subpart F.

Treaty text · South Africa treaty rates

South Korea

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed June 4, 1976.

1112

Code 11 or 12? IRS Table 4 lists Article 17 (Investment or Holding Companies) as the South Korea treaty’s limitation provision. That article denies some benefits to low-taxed companies owned 25% or more by non-residents, but it has none of the qualifying tests an LOB article has. The IRS has not said which box 13n code fits. One reading is 12, because there is no limitation-on-benefits article as the W-8BEN-E uses the term; the other is 11 (Other), because the IRS table treats the article as the limitation. Pick one, record why, and use it consistently.

Treaty text · South Korea treaty rates

Spain

Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits). Protocol signed January 14, 2013 (replaced Article 17 of 1990 Convention).

02030405060708091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Religious, charitable, scientific, artistic, cultural or educational entity (2(d)(i))04Other tax-exempt organization
Pension fund under Art 3(1)(j) (2(d)(ii))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (2(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Derivative benefits (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Headquarters company (5)11Other (name the test)
Competent authority determination (7)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: yesActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 6 triangular rule for income via third-state PE. Protocol para 5 adds interpretive rules for Art 17.

Treaty text Also · Spain treaty rates

Sri Lanka

Article 23 (Limitation on Benefits). Protocol signed September 20, 2002 (replaced Article 23 of 1985 Convention).

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Qualified governmental entity (2(b))02Government
Company whose majority share classes are regularly traded (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt religious, charitable or similar legal person, Art 4(1)(c)(i) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Exempt pension legal person, Art 4(1)(c)(ii) (2(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Ownership and base erosion (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business with 7.5%/10% safe harbor (3)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

1985 treaty text not linked on IRS page; LOB read from the 2002 Protocol, which replaced Art 23 in full.

Treaty text · Sri Lanka treaty rates

Sweden

Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits). Protocol signed September 30, 2005 (replaced Article 17 of 1994 Convention).

020304050607080910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (2(b))02Government
Company whose principal class is regularly traded and primarily traded in residence State or managed there (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Pension organization under Art 4(1)(c), more than 50% beneficiaries resident or sponsor qualified (2(d))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Tax-exempt organization under Art 4(1)(c) (2(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership and base erosion (2(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Derivative benefits (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (6)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 5 triangular rule for Swedish enterprise's U.S. interest/royalties via third-state PE. 1994 treaty text not linked on IRS page.

Treaty text Also · Sweden treaty rates

Switzerland

Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed October 2, 1996.

02030405060708091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
State, subdivision, local authority, agency or instrumentality (1(b))02Government
Active trade or business (1(c))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Recognized headquarters company (1(d))11Other (name the test)
Company whose principal class is primarily and regularly traded (1(e)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company predominantly owned by 1(e)(i) companies (1(e)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Company, trust or estate not predominantly owned by non-qualified persons (1(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Swiss family foundation (1(g))11Other (name the test)
Art 4(1)(c) organization, more than half beneficiaries qualified (2)04Other tax-exempt organization
Art 4(1)(c) pension organization (2)03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Derivative benefits for Arts 10-12, 30%/70% test (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Competent authority determination (6)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: yesActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

1(f) is an ownership test without explicit base erosion; derivative test (3) has its own base erosion. Para 4 triangular rule. 2009 Protocol TE references Art 22(2) for pensions only.

Treaty text Also · Switzerland treaty rates

Thailand

Article 18 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed November 26, 1996.

02040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (1(b))02Government
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion (1(c))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (1(d))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company wholly owned by 1(d) company (1(e))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt not-for-profit organization (1(f))04Other tax-exempt organization
Active trade or business (2)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 3 denies U.S. benefits to Thai international banking facilities. Para 6 remittance-basis rule.

Treaty text · Thailand treaty rates

Trinidad and Tobago

No limitation-on-benefits article. Convention signed January 9, 1970.

1112

Code 11 or 12? IRS Table 4 lists Article 16 (Investment or Holding Companies) as the Trinidad and Tobago treaty’s limitation provision. That article denies some benefits to low-taxed companies owned 25% or more by non-residents, but it has none of the qualifying tests an LOB article has. The IRS has not said which box 13n code fits. One reading is 12, because there is no limitation-on-benefits article as the W-8BEN-E uses the term; the other is 11 (Other), because the IRS table treats the article as the limitation. Pick one, record why, and use it consistently.

Treaty text · Trinidad and Tobago treaty rates

Tunisia

Article 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure), paragraphs 5 to 7; no article titled Limitation on Benefits. Protocol signed October 4, 1989 (Article VIII added paras 5-7 to Art 25 of 1985 Convention).

05070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
more than 50% owned by resident individuals, States or U.S. citizens and income not used substantially for others (5(a))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business (5(b))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (5(c))05Publicly-traded corporation
Competent authority determination (7)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

LOB-type rules placed in the Mutual Agreement Procedure article. Para 6 requires competent authority consultation before denial.

Judgment call. The Tunisia treaty has no article titled Limitation on Benefits; its LOB-type tests sit in Article 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure). The codes above map those tests. If you read the treaty as having no LOB article, code 12 would apply instead.

Treaty text · Tunisia treaty rates

Turkey

Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed March 28, 1996.

02040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion (1)07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Active trade or business, substantial (2)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (3(a))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company wholly owned by 3(a) company, chain in Contracting States (3(b))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Contracting State, political subdivision or local authority (4)02Government
Exempt not-for-profit organization with qualified support (5)04Other tax-exempt organization
Competent authority determination (6)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Not-for-profit test measured by annual support expended for or derived from qualified persons.

Treaty text · Turkey treaty rates

Ukraine

Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed March 4, 1994.

040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Active conduct of business (1(b))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with shares traded in residence State on officially recognized exchange (1(c))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company wholly owned by such a resident listed company (1(c))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Exempt not-for-profit organization (1(d))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion (1(e))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Competent authority determination (2)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

No government test in the article. Same structure as Kazakhstan.

Treaty text · Ukraine treaty rates

United Kingdom

Article 23 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed July 24, 2001.

02030405060708091011
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
Qualified governmental entity (2(b))02Government
Company listed in UK or U.S. and regularly traded (2(c)(i))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 2(c)(i) companies (2(c)(ii))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Listed unit trust or other non-company person, or 50% owned by such (2(d))11Other (name the test)
Pension scheme under Art 4(3) (2(e))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Charity or other exempt person under Art 4(3) (2(e))04Other tax-exempt organization
Ownership and base erosion (2(f))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Trust 50% owned by qualified persons or equivalent beneficiaries (2(g))11Other (name the test)
Derivative benefits (3)08Company that meets the derivative benefits test
Active trade or business (4)09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Competent authority determination (6)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: yesHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 5 disproportionate share class rule. No triangular rule in Art 23. 2002 Protocol and 2001 notes reviewed for references only.

Treaty text Also · United Kingdom treaty rates

Venezuela

Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits). Original Convention signed January 25, 1999.

0203040506070910
Test in the treatyBox 13nW-8BEN-E line 14b
State, subdivision, local authority, instrumentality or wholly state-owned company (1(b))02Government
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension fund or private foundation (1(c))04Other tax-exempt organization
Not-for-profit organization incl. pension fund (1(c))03Tax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
Active trade or business, substantial (1(d))09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
Company with substantial and regular trading on recognized exchange (1(e))05Publicly-traded corporation
Company at least 50% owned by five or fewer 1(e) companies (1(f))06Subsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
Ownership more than 50% and base erosion (1(g))07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion test
Competent authority determination (4)10Favorable discretionary determination received
Derivative benefits: noHeadquarters: noActive business: yesCompetent authority grant: yes

Para 2 denies benefits to Venezuelan entidad or colectividad with disproportionate interest classes. Para 3 excludes tax-motivated former U.S. long-term residents for 10 years.

Treaty text · Venezuela treaty rates

The finder maps the treaty’s tests to codes. It does not test whether this payee qualifies: that comes from the W-8BEN-E line 14b box the payee checked and, for the ownership, derivative benefits and active business tests, the facts behind it.

How box 13n works

Box 13n of Form 1042-S takes a limitation-on-benefits code when an entity claims a reduced treaty rate and its documentation shows which LOB test it meets. The instructions say to enter it when the beneficial owner “has provided documentation that establishes the LOB article under which the beneficial owner qualifies.” Individuals do not get a code, and a qualified intermediary, withholding partnership or withholding trust reporting a chapter 3 pool leaves the box blank.

The documentation is usually Form W-8BEN-E. On line 14b the entity checks the test it meets, and each box corresponds to one code:

CodeForm 1042-S descriptionW-8BEN-E line 14b box
02Government - contracting state/political subdivision/local authorityGovernment
03Tax exempt pension trust/pension fundTax-exempt pension trust or pension fund
04Tax exempt/charitable organizationOther tax-exempt organization
05Publicly traded corporationPublicly-traded corporation
06Subsidiary of publicly traded corporationSubsidiary of publicly-traded corporation
07Company that meets the ownership and base erosion testCompany that meets the ownership and base erosion test
08Company that meets the derivative benefits testCompany that meets the derivative benefits test
09Company with an item of income that meets the active trade or business testCompany with an item of income that meets the active trade or business test
10Discretionary determinationFavorable discretionary determination received
11OtherOther (name the test)
12No LOB article in treatyNo LOB article in treaty

Tests with no box of their own (headquarters companies, listed unit trusts, investment entities, shipping rules and similar) map to 11 (Other), and the entity names the test, for example “Headquarters test, Article 26(5)”, the example the W-8BEN-E instructions use for the Netherlands.

The treaties that need care

  • No LOB article (code 12). Greece, Pakistan, the Philippines, Poland, Romania and the 1973 U.S.S.R. treaty that still covers nine former Soviet republics. The entity checks “No LOB article in treaty”.
  • Investment or holding company articles. Egypt, South Korea, Morocco, Norway, and Trinidad and Tobago have an article IRS Table 4 lists as the limitation provision, but it has no qualifying tests. Code 11 or 12 can be argued; each card explains both readings.
  • LOB tests outside an LOB article. China (1984 Protocol), Indonesia (Article 28) and Tunisia (Article 25) put LOB-type tests in other provisions. The finder maps those tests; code 12 is the alternative reading.
  • No benefits at all. Hungary (terminated; ended for withholding on January 1, 2024) and Russia (suspended from August 16, 2024). Withhold at statutory rates.
  • Derivative benefits (code 08) exists in only 17 treaties, mostly with EU members, plus Canada, Iceland, Mexico, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. A code 08 claim under a treaty without that test is an error on its face.

Mistakes that make a claim fail

  • No box checked on line 14b for a treaty with an LOB article. The claim is incomplete and the reduced rate should not be applied.
  • A test the treaty does not have. For example, derivative benefits under the Japan or Australia treaty, or a headquarters test under the U.K. treaty.
  • Code 12 for a treaty that has an LOB article. Most modern treaties have one; check the card.
  • Ignoring the anti-abuse rules beside the tests. Many treaties add triangular branch rules, disproportionate share class rules or special-regime exclusions (Barbados, Portugal, Thailand) that can deny benefits even when a test is met. They are in each card’s notes.

Questions people ask

Do individuals need an LOB code?

No. There is no box 13n code for individuals. LOB articles mostly test entities; an individual resident of the treaty country is usually a qualified person automatically.

Where does the code come from?

From the payee’s documentation, normally the box checked on line 14b of Form W-8BEN-E. You do not choose the test; you report the one the payee claimed, if it exists in that treaty.

What if the payee received a discretionary determination?

Code 10. The entity checks “Favorable discretionary determination received” on line 14b. Not every treaty provides for one: Cyprus, Indonesia, Jamaica and China, for example, have no competent authority grant.

Is this list complete?

It covers every treaty on the IRS A to Z list. Where the IRS page did not link the base treaty (Sweden 1994, Sri Lanka 1985) the LOB article was read from the protocol that replaced it in full. Luxembourg’s 1996 LOB article was read from the Senate treaty document because the IRS page links only the 1962 treaty.